Overview
Valued Advisors
Hopkins & Carley attorneys have a deep understanding of the legal issues that impact clients in this highly competitive business environment. The firm’s success advising retail companies of all sizes stems from our dedication to helping businesses grow and succeed while protecting brand equity. Hopkins & Carley’s extensive experience and professional breadth allow the firm to provide top-quality counsel in virtually every area affecting retail businesses.
Experience
- Advised McDonald’s, Taco Bell, and Applebee’s franchisees in connection with entity formation and governance issues, and the purchase and sale of individual and multiple restaurant locations.
- Represented a large regional bank in a series of related construction loans for mixed use project that included hotel and retail space.
- Obtained a $3.5 million settlement for a shopping center landlord after its anchor tenant, a major grocery chain, ceased operations and abandoned the premises.
- Represented local grocery store and national grocery chain in leasing and subleasing of their stores, including licenses for use of space within the stores.
- Represented landlords in the Borders, Radio Shack and American Apparel bankruptcies, achieving a settlement of a dispute concerning a contingent proof of claim, negotiating the immediate assignment of the lease; and successfully negotiating assumption of lease with no change in lease terms.
- Represented the owner of a retail shopping center whose anchor tenant withheld a full year of rent. The case settled a week before trial resulting in our client receiving 100% of damages and legal expenses.
- Assisted grocers in the ground lease and development of grocery stores throughout California.
New Law Expands Employers' Obligation to Provide Anti-Harassment Training
Since 2006, California has required employers who receive services from 50 or more persons to provide anti-harassment training to their supervisors. The new law expands the training obligation to empl... Read more »
Is It Ever Okay for a Non-Exempt Employee to Work "Off the Clock"? California Supreme Court Rejects Federal "de minimis" Defense in Starbucks' Case
In Troester v. Starbucks, the California Supreme Court rejected the application of the de minimis defense to work performed by Starbucks' hourly employees who were required to close out the store afte... Read more »
Flat Sum Bonuses and the Regular Rate of Pay - The California Supreme Court Provides Certainty
A recent decision by the California Supreme Court has clarified how employers should calculate the regular rate of pay when an employee earns a flat sum bonus. Here is what you need to know and what e... Read more »
Waiting for the Other Shoe to Drop - Lessons from Zappos' Data Breach
Businesses must have processes in place to safeguard customer data or may be liable to customers in the event of a data breach. This is true even if customers experience no identify theft because of t... Read more »
Local Minimum Wage Increases in Several Cities on July 1
As a result of many cities' recent minimum wage increases, employers need to be familiar not only with the state minimum wage, but also any local minimum wage laws that may be applicable to them. Read more »